You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Telephone interviews and online questionnaires can be used to improve neurodevelopmental follow-up rates
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Research Notes, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1756-0500-7-219 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Samantha Johnson, Sarah E Seaton, Bradley N Manktelow, Lucy K Smith, David Field, Elizabeth S Draper, Neil Marlow, Elaine M Boyle |
Abstract |
Maximising response rates to neurodevelopmental follow-up is a key challenge for paediatric researchers. We have investigated the use of telephone interviews and online questionnaires to improve response rates, reduce non-response bias, maintain data completeness and produce unbiased outcomes compared with postal questionnaires when assessing neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 15% |
Researcher | 6 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Unknown | 11 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 40% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Psychology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Unknown | 13 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2015.
All research outputs
#6,939,786
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,099
of 4,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,728
of 228,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#21
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.