↓ Skip to main content

Telephone interviews and online questionnaires can be used to improve neurodevelopmental follow-up rates

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Telephone interviews and online questionnaires can be used to improve neurodevelopmental follow-up rates
Published in
BMC Research Notes, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-7-219
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samantha Johnson, Sarah E Seaton, Bradley N Manktelow, Lucy K Smith, David Field, Elizabeth S Draper, Neil Marlow, Elaine M Boyle

Abstract

Maximising response rates to neurodevelopmental follow-up is a key challenge for paediatric researchers. We have investigated the use of telephone interviews and online questionnaires to improve response rates, reduce non-response bias, maintain data completeness and produce unbiased outcomes compared with postal questionnaires when assessing neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Philosophy 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 9 23%
Unknown 10 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2015.
All research outputs
#4,221,667
of 14,698,477 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#744
of 3,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,486
of 189,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,698,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,335 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them