↓ Skip to main content

Frequent utilization of the emergency department for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Frequent utilization of the emergency department for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Respiratory Research, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1465-9921-15-40
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kohei Hasegawa, Yusuke Tsugawa, Chu-Lin Tsai, David FM Brown, Carlos A Camargo

Abstract

Little is known about patients who frequently visit the emergency department (ED) for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). We aimed to quantify the proportion and characteristics of patients with frequent ED visits for AECOPD and associated healthcare utilization.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 3%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 76 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 23%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Other 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 18 23%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 43%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 8%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 19 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2014.
All research outputs
#14,915,133
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#1,499
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,250
of 241,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#15
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.