↓ Skip to main content

A safe and convenient pseudovirus-based inhibition assay to detect neutralizing antibodies and screen for viral entry inhibitors against the novel human coronavirus MERS-CoV

Overview of attention for article published in Virology Journal, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 X users
patent
7 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
129 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A safe and convenient pseudovirus-based inhibition assay to detect neutralizing antibodies and screen for viral entry inhibitors against the novel human coronavirus MERS-CoV
Published in
Virology Journal, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1743-422x-10-266
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guangyu Zhao, Lanying Du, Cuiqing Ma, Ye Li, Lin Li, Vincent KM Poon, Lili Wang, Fei Yu, Bo-Jian Zheng, Shibo Jiang, Yusen Zhou

Abstract

Evidence points to the emergence of a novel human coronavirus, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), which causes a severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-like disease. In response, the development of effective vaccines and therapeutics remains a clinical priority. To accomplish this, it is necessary to evaluate neutralizing antibodies and screen for MERS-CoV entry inhibitors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 211 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 15%
Student > Master 26 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 4%
Other 33 15%
Unknown 56 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 24 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 10%
Engineering 7 3%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 60 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,657,399
of 25,323,244 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#127
of 3,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,072
of 207,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#2
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,323,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.