You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Construction and application for QTL analysis of a Restriction Site Associated DNA (RAD) linkage map in barley
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-12-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yada Chutimanitsakun, Rick W Nipper, Alfonso Cuesta-Marcos, Luis Cistué, Ann Corey, Tanya Filichkina, Eric A Johnson, Patrick M Hayes |
| Abstract |
Linkage maps are an integral resource for dissection of complex genetic traits in plant and animal species. Canonical map construction follows a well-established workflow: an initial discovery phase where genetic markers are mined from a small pool of individuals, followed by genotyping of selected mapping populations using sets of marker panels. A newly developed sequence-based marker technology, Restriction site Associated DNA (RAD), enables synchronous single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) marker discovery and genotyping using massively parallel sequencing. The objective of this research was to assess the utility of RAD markers for linkage map construction, employing barley as a model system. Using the published high density EST-based SNP map in the Oregon Wolfe Barley (OWB) mapping population as a reference, we created a RAD map using a limited set of prior markers to establish linakge group identity, integrated the RAD and prior data, and used both maps for detection of quantitative trait loci (QTL). |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 463 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Colombia | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| Norway | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| China | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 14 | 3% |
| Unknown | 417 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 130 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 118 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 58 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 23 | 5% |
| Other | 72 | 16% |
| Unknown | 35 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 355 | 77% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 32 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 2% |
| Engineering | 4 | <1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 15 | 3% |
| Unknown | 44 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2011.
All research outputs
#20,712,517
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#9,365
of 10,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,512
of 182,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#81
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,742 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.