You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
CODEX-aligned dietary fiber definitions help to bridge the ‘fiber gap’
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-13-34 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie Miller Jones |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 512 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 507 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 93 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 61 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 58 | 11% |
| Researcher | 47 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 32 | 6% |
| Other | 84 | 16% |
| Unknown | 137 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 131 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 40 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 7% |
| Engineering | 28 | 5% |
| Other | 77 | 15% |
| Unknown | 150 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,042,702
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#296
of 1,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,906
of 243,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#7
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.