↓ Skip to main content

Mitochondrial and Y-chromosome diversity of the Tharus (Nepal): a reservoir of genetic variation

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Evolutionary Biology, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
33 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mitochondrial and Y-chromosome diversity of the Tharus (Nepal): a reservoir of genetic variation
Published in
BMC Evolutionary Biology, July 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-9-154
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simona Fornarino, Maria Pala, Vincenza Battaglia, Ramona Maranta, Alessandro Achilli, Guido Modiano, Antonio Torroni, Ornella Semino, Silvana A Santachiara-Benerecetti

Abstract

Central Asia and the Indian subcontinent represent an area considered as a source and a reservoir for human genetic diversity, with many markers taking root here, most of which are the ancestral state of eastern and western haplogroups, while others are local. Between these two regions, Terai (Nepal) is a pivotal passageway allowing, in different times, multiple population interactions, although because of its highly malarial environment, it was scarcely inhabited until a few decades ago, when malaria was eradicated. One of the oldest and the largest indigenous people of Terai is represented by the malaria resistant Tharus, whose gene pool could still retain traces of ancient complex interactions. Until now, however, investigations on their genetic structure have been scarce mainly identifying East Asian signatures.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
India 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 74 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 22%
Researcher 17 21%
Student > Master 13 16%
Professor 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 11 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,678,374
of 22,270,761 outputs
Outputs from BMC Evolutionary Biology
#359
of 2,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,542
of 207,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Evolutionary Biology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,270,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them