↓ Skip to main content

Concordance between medical records and interview data in correctional facilities

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Concordance between medical records and interview data in correctional facilities
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-14-50
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer R Bai, Dhritiman V Mukherjee, Montina Befus, Zoltan Apa, Franklin D Lowy, Elaine L Larson

Abstract

Self- administered questionnaires or interviews and medical records are often used as sources of research data; thus it is essential to evaluate their concordance and reliability. The aim of this paper was to assess the concordance between medical and behavioral data obtained from medical records and interview questionnaires in two correctional facilities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Pakistan 1 1%
Unknown 78 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 13 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 15 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2014.
All research outputs
#20,228,193
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,869
of 2,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,900
of 228,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#30
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,007 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.