↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: The composition and stability of the vaginal microbiota of normal pregnant women is different from that of non-pregnant women

Overview of attention for article published in Microbiome, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: The composition and stability of the vaginal microbiota of normal pregnant women is different from that of non-pregnant women
Published in
Microbiome, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/2049-2618-2-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roberto Romero, Sonia S Hassan, Pawel Gajer, Adi L Tarca, Douglas W Fadrosh, Lorraine Nikita, Marisa Galuppi, Ronald F Lamont, Piya Chaemsaithong, Jezid Miranda, Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa, Jacques Ravel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 112 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 17%
Student > Bachelor 17 15%
Student > Master 13 12%
Researcher 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 30 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 31 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2014.
All research outputs
#14,194,875
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#1,357
of 1,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,140
of 226,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#11
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.