You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Does the primary screening test influence women’s anxiety and intention to screen for cervical cancer? A randomized survey of Norwegian women
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-360 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Emily A Burger, Mari Nygård, Dorte Gyrd-Hansen, Tron Anders Moger, Ivar Sonbo Kristiansen |
Abstract |
Countries must decide whether or not to replace primary cytology-based screening with primary human papillomavirus (HPV)-based screening. We aimed to assess how primary screening for an HPV infection, a sexually transmitted infection (STI), and the type of information included in the invitation letter, will affect screening intention. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 53 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
Researcher | 6 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Unknown | 14 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 28% |
Psychology | 9 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Unknown | 15 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2014.
All research outputs
#18,370,767
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#12,820
of 14,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,172
of 226,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#229
of 262 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 262 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.