↓ Skip to main content

Bayesian neural networks for detecting epistasis in genetic association studies

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bayesian neural networks for detecting epistasis in genetic association studies
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12859-014-0368-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew L Beam, Alison Motsinger-Reif, Jon Doyle

Abstract

BackgroundDiscovering causal genetic variants from large genetic association studies poses many difficult challenges. Assessing which genetic markers are involved in determining trait status is a computationally demanding task, especially in the presence of gene-gene interactions.ResultsA non-parametric Bayesian approach in the form of a Bayesian neural network is proposed for use in analyzing genetic association studies. Demonstrations on synthetic and real data reveal they are able to efficiently and accurately determine which variants are involved in determining case-control status. By using graphics processing units (GPUs) the time needed to build these models is decreased by several orders of magnitude. In comparison with commonly used approaches for detecting interactions, Bayesian neural networks perform very well across a broad spectrum of possible genetic relationships.ConclusionsThe proposed framework is shown to be a powerful method for detecting causal SNPs while being computationally efficient enough to handle large datasets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 76 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 39%
Student > Master 15 19%
Researcher 10 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Other 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 26%
Computer Science 19 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 10%
Mathematics 6 8%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 18 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2015.
All research outputs
#1,627,475
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#349
of 7,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,982
of 361,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#10
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.