↓ Skip to main content

Can cholesterol be used to distinguish pleural exudates from transudates? evidence from a bivariate meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Can cholesterol be used to distinguish pleural exudates from transudates? evidence from a bivariate meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2466-14-61
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yongchun Shen, Hong Zhu, Chun Wan, Lei Chen, Tao Wang, Ting Yang, Fuqiang Wen

Abstract

Many studies have investigated whether pleural cholesterol levels can aid in diagnosis of pleural exudates, and the results have varied considerably. To gain a more reliable answer to this question, we meta-analyzed the literature on using pleural cholesterol or the ratio of cholesterol in pleural fluid to cholesterol in serum (P/S cholesterol ratio) as diagnostic tests to help identify pleural exudates.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 6 22%
Student > Master 4 15%
Other 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 74%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2020.
All research outputs
#19,292,491
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#1,504
of 2,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,576
of 229,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#30
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,030 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.