↓ Skip to main content

Evolution of gene structure in the conifer Picea glauca: a comparative analysis of the impact of intron size

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Plant Biology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evolution of gene structure in the conifer Picea glauca: a comparative analysis of the impact of intron size
Published in
BMC Plant Biology, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2229-14-95
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juliana Stival Sena, Isabelle Giguère, Brian Boyle, Philippe Rigault, Inanc Birol, Andrea Zuccolo, Kermit Ritland, Carol Ritland, Joerg Bohlmann, Steven Jones, Jean Bousquet, John Mackay

Abstract

A positive relationship between genome size and intron length is observed across eukaryotes including Angiosperms plants, indicating a co-evolution of genome size and gene structure. Conifers have very large genomes and longer introns on average than most plants, but impacts of their large genome and longer introns on gene structure has not be described.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Uruguay 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 64 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 30%
Researcher 16 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Professor 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 5 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 61%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 25%
Computer Science 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 1%
Unknown 6 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2014.
All research outputs
#15,169,543
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#1,086
of 3,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,857
of 224,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#28
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,588 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.