↓ Skip to main content

Long-term air pollution exposure and living close to busy roads are associated with COPD in women

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, December 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
321 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
252 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long-term air pollution exposure and living close to busy roads are associated with COPD in women
Published in
Respiratory Research, December 2005
DOI 10.1186/1465-9921-6-152
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tamara Schikowski, Dorothea Sugiri, Ulrich Ranft, Ulrike Gehring, Joachim Heinrich, H-Erich Wichmann, Ursula Krämer

Abstract

Lung function and exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have been associated with short-term exposure to air pollution. However, the effect of long-term exposure to particulate matter from industry and traffic on COPD as defined by lung function has not been evaluated so far. Our study was designed to investigate the influence of long-term exposure to air pollution on respiratory symptoms and pulmonary function in 55-year-old women. We especially focused on COPD as defined by GOLD criteria and additionally compared the effects of air pollution on respiratory symptoms by questionnaire data and by lung function measurements.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 244 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 15%
Student > Master 34 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 8%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Other 55 22%
Unknown 48 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 27%
Environmental Science 49 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Other 52 21%
Unknown 55 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2019.
All research outputs
#4,309,022
of 25,591,967 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#541
of 3,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,252
of 172,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,591,967 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.