↓ Skip to main content

Adapting a community-based ART delivery model to the patients’ needs: a mixed methods research in Tete, Mozambique

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adapting a community-based ART delivery model to the patients’ needs: a mixed methods research in Tete, Mozambique
Published in
BMC Public Health, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-364
Pubmed ID
Authors

Freya Rasschaert, Tom Decroo, Daniel Remartinez, Barbara Telfer, Faustino Lessitala, Marc Biot, Baltazar Candrinho, Wim Van Damme

Abstract

To improve retention in antiretroviral therapy (ART), lessons learned from chronic disease care were applied to HIV care, providing more responsibilities to patients in the care of their chronic disease. In Tete--Mozambique, patients stable on ART participate in the ART provision and peer support through Community ART Groups (CAG). This article analyses the evolution of the CAG-model during its implementation process.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Malawi 1 <1%
Sierra Leone 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 130 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 18%
Researcher 22 16%
Other 10 7%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 20 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 18%
Social Sciences 20 15%
Psychology 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 29 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2014.
All research outputs
#7,611,914
of 12,184,037 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,155
of 8,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,471
of 177,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#195
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,184,037 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.