↓ Skip to main content

The direct and indirect costs of both overweight and obesity: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
232 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
426 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The direct and indirect costs of both overweight and obesity: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Research Notes, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-7-242
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne Dee, Karen Kearns, Ciaran O’Neill, Linda Sharp, Anthony Staines, Victoria O’Dwyer, Sarah Fitzgerald, Ivan J Perry

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 426 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 417 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 67 16%
Student > Bachelor 58 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 35 8%
Researcher 31 7%
Other 87 20%
Unknown 94 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 96 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 45 11%
Social Sciences 28 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 5%
Other 96 23%
Unknown 112 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2023.
All research outputs
#4,401,611
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#620
of 4,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,662
of 228,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#10
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.