↓ Skip to main content

Harnessing microbiome and probiotic research in sub-Saharan Africa: recommendations from an African workshop

Overview of attention for article published in Microbiome, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Harnessing microbiome and probiotic research in sub-Saharan Africa: recommendations from an African workshop
Published in
Microbiome, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/2049-2618-2-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gregor Reid, Nicholas Nduti, Wilbert Sybesma, Remco Kort, Tobias R Kollmann, Rod Adam, Hamadi Boga, Eric M Brown, Alexandra Einerhand, Hani El-Nezami, Gregory B Gloor, Irene I Kavere, Johanna Lindahl, Amee Manges, Wondu Mamo, Rocio Martin, Amy McMillan, Jael Obiero, Pamela A Ochieng’, Arnold Onyango, Stephen Rulisa, Eeva Salminen, Seppo Salminen, Antony Sije, Jonathan R Swann, William van Treuren, Daniel Waweru, Steve J Kemp

Abstract

To augment capacity-building for microbiome and probiotic research in Africa, a workshop was held in Nairobi, Kenya, at which researchers discussed human, animal, insect, and agricultural microbiome and probiotics/prebiotics topics. Five recommendations were made to promote future basic and translational research that benefits Africans.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 144 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 6%
Other 35 24%
Unknown 33 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 41 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2016.
All research outputs
#6,134,219
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#1,233
of 1,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,546
of 203,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.