↓ Skip to main content

Geographical variation in Plasmodium vivax relapse

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
237 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
304 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Geographical variation in Plasmodium vivax relapse
Published in
Malaria Journal, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-13-144
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine E Battle, Markku S Karhunen, Samir Bhatt, Peter W Gething, Rosalind E Howes, Nick Golding, Thomas P Van Boeckel, Jane P Messina, G Dennis Shanks, David L Smith, J Kevin Baird, Simon I Hay

Abstract

Plasmodium vivax has the widest geographic distribution of the human malaria parasites and nearly 2.5 billion people live at risk of infection. The control of P. vivax in individuals and populations is complicated by its ability to relapse weeks to months after initial infection. Strains of P. vivax from different geographical areas are thought to exhibit varied relapse timings. In tropical regions strains relapse quickly (three to six weeks), whereas those in temperate regions do so more slowly (six to twelve months), but no comprehensive assessment of evidence has been conducted. Here observed patterns of relapse periodicity are used to generate predictions of relapse incidence within geographic regions representative of varying parasite transmission.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 299 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 53 17%
Student > Master 52 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 6%
Other 17 6%
Other 52 17%
Unknown 70 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 4%
Other 45 15%
Unknown 84 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,838,453
of 23,257,423 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#347
of 5,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,527
of 227,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#7
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,257,423 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.