↓ Skip to main content

A scoping review of classification schemes of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into practice in healthcare

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
41 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A scoping review of classification schemes of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into practice in healthcare
Published in
Implementation Science, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13012-015-0220-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cynthia Lokker, K Ann McKibbon, Heather Colquhoun, Susanne Hempel

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 191 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 21%
Student > Master 36 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 14%
Other 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 36 18%
Unknown 25 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 34 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 17%
Social Sciences 29 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 4%
Other 46 23%
Unknown 33 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2016.
All research outputs
#1,197,804
of 21,735,696 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#249
of 1,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,907
of 289,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,735,696 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them