You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Developing clinical practice guidelines: types of evidence and outcomes; values and economics, synthesis, grading, and presentation and deriving recommendations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-7-61 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steven Woolf, Holger J Schünemann, Martin P Eccles, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Paul Shekelle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
| Ireland | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 333 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 315 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 55 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 15% |
| Researcher | 41 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 86 | 26% |
| Unknown | 51 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 121 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 55 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 5% |
| Psychology | 13 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 46 | 14% |
| Unknown | 71 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,687,435
of 24,375,780 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#323
of 1,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,928
of 167,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,375,780 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.