↓ Skip to main content

Legacy for ChildrenTM: a pair of randomized controlled trials of a public health model to improve developmental outcomes among children in poverty

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Legacy for ChildrenTM: a pair of randomized controlled trials of a public health model to improve developmental outcomes among children in poverty
Published in
BMC Public Health, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-691
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruth Perou, Marc N Elliott, Susanna N Visser, Angelika H Claussen, Keith G Scott, Leila H Beckwith, Judy Howard, Lynne F Katz, D Camille Smith

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 116 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 16%
Student > Master 16 14%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Librarian 5 4%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 35 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 19%
Social Sciences 21 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 36 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2014.
All research outputs
#7,426,078
of 24,143,470 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,780
of 15,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,831
of 171,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#138
of 322 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,143,470 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,889 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 322 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.