↓ Skip to main content

A conceptual framework and protocol for defining clinical decision support objectives applicable to medical specialties

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A conceptual framework and protocol for defining clinical decision support objectives applicable to medical specialties
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-12-93
Pubmed ID
Authors

Justin W Timbie, Cheryl L Damberg, Eric C Schneider, Douglas S Bell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
India 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 76 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 18%
Student > Master 14 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Other 19 23%
Unknown 5 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 37%
Computer Science 12 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Social Sciences 7 8%
Engineering 6 7%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 9 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2013.
All research outputs
#1,592,005
of 8,139,726 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#234
of 972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,948
of 100,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,139,726 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 972 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.