You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Building on the EGIPPS performance assessment: the multipolar framework as a heuristic to tackle the complexity of performance of public service oriented health care organisations
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-378 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bruno Marchal, Tom Hoerée, Valéria Campos da Silveira, Sara Van Belle, Nuggehalli S Prashanth, Guy Kegels |
Abstract |
Performance of health care systems is a key concern of policy makers and health service managers all over the world. It is also a major challenge, given its multidimensional nature that easily leads to conceptual and methodological confusion. This is reflected by a scarcity of models that comprehensively analyse health system performance. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 3 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Uganda | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 125 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 37 | 29% |
Researcher | 18 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 4% |
Other | 20 | 16% |
Unknown | 26 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 38% |
Social Sciences | 14 | 11% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 7% |
Engineering | 5 | 4% |
Other | 14 | 11% |
Unknown | 27 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2021.
All research outputs
#4,822,482
of 24,217,496 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,326
of 15,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,214
of 230,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#72
of 261 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 261 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.