↓ Skip to main content

Exploring disability from the perspective of adults living with HIV/AIDS: Development of a conceptual framework

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
26 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
150 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring disability from the perspective of adults living with HIV/AIDS: Development of a conceptual framework
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, October 2008
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-6-76
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelly K O'Brien, Ahmed M Bayoumi, Carol Strike, Nancy L Young, Aileen M Davis

Abstract

Since the advent of combination antiretroviral therapy, in developed countries HIV increasingly is perceived as a long-term illness. Individuals may experience health-related consequences of HIV and its associated treatments, a concept that may be termed disability. To date, a comprehensive framework for understanding the health-related consequences experienced by people living with HIV has not been developed. The purpose of this research was to develop a conceptual framework of disability from the perspective of adults living with HIV.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 156 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 18%
Student > Bachelor 23 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Researcher 10 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 5%
Other 34 21%
Unknown 39 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 16%
Social Sciences 22 13%
Psychology 10 6%
Arts and Humanities 7 4%
Other 27 17%
Unknown 43 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,202,064
of 25,401,784 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#129
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,048
of 101,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,401,784 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.