↓ Skip to main content

Effects of enamel matrix derivative on the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of human gingival mesenchymal stem cells

Overview of attention for article published in Stem Cell Research & Therapy, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of enamel matrix derivative on the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of human gingival mesenchymal stem cells
Published in
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/scrt441
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shu-Man Wu, Hsien-Chung Chiu, Yu-Tang Chin, Heng-Yi Lin, Cheng-Yang Chiang, Hsiao-Pei Tu, Martin MJ Fu, Earl Fu

Abstract

Gingiva-derived mesenchymal stem cells (GMSCs) have recently been harvested and applied for rebuilding lost periodontal tissue. Enamel matrix derivative (EMD) has been used for periodontal regeneration and the formation of new cementum with inserting collagen fibers; however, alveolar bone formation is minimal. Recently, EMD has been shown to enhance the proliferation and mineralization of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Because the gingival flap is the major component to cover the surgical wound, the effects of EMD on the proliferation and mineralization of GMSCs were evaluated in the present study.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 2%
India 1 2%
Colombia 1 2%
Unknown 44 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 19%
Student > Master 8 17%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 9 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 60%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 8 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2014.
All research outputs
#4,164,588
of 22,754,104 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#412
of 2,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,670
of 203,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#7
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,754,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.