You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Chronic cocaine-regulated epigenomic changes in mouse nucleus accumbens
|
---|---|
Published in |
Genome Biology, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/gb-2014-15-4-r65 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jian Feng, Matthew Wilkinson, Xiaochuan Liu, Immanuel Purushothaman, Deveroux Ferguson, Vincent Vialou, Ian Maze, Ningyi Shao, Pamela Kennedy, JaWook Koo, Caroline Dias, Benjamin Laitman, Victoria Stockman, Quincey LaPlant, Michael E Cahill, Eric J Nestler, Li Shen |
Abstract |
Increasing evidence supports a role for altered gene expression in mediating the lasting effects of cocaine on the brain, and recent work has demonstrated the involvement of chromatin modifications in these alterations. However, all such studies to date have been restricted by their reliance on microarray technologies that have intrinsic limitations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 9 | 23% |
United States | 6 | 15% |
Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Spain | 1 | 3% |
France | 1 | 3% |
Mexico | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 19 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 29 | 73% |
Scientists | 7 | 18% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 2 | 1% |
United States | 2 | 1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Argentina | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
China | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 176 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 26% |
Researcher | 34 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 10% |
Student > Master | 12 | 6% |
Other | 28 | 15% |
Unknown | 26 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 28% |
Neuroscience | 45 | 24% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 15% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 4% |
Psychology | 7 | 4% |
Other | 14 | 8% |
Unknown | 33 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2017.
All research outputs
#937,315
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#653
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,898
of 241,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#7
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.