↓ Skip to main content

The risks and rewards of covariate adjustment in randomized trials: an assessment of 12 outcomes from 8 studies

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
47 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
168 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The risks and rewards of covariate adjustment in randomized trials: an assessment of 12 outcomes from 8 studies
Published in
Trials, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-139
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brennan C Kahan, Vipul Jairath, Caroline J Doré, Tim P Morris

Abstract

Adjustment for prognostic covariates can lead to increased power in the analysis of randomized trials. However, adjusted analyses are not often performed in practice.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Qatar 1 <1%
Unknown 187 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 20%
Student > Master 24 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Student > Postgraduate 12 6%
Other 41 21%
Unknown 18 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 32%
Mathematics 17 9%
Social Sciences 14 7%
Psychology 14 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 6%
Other 41 21%
Unknown 33 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2021.
All research outputs
#913,052
of 19,338,160 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#202
of 5,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,609
of 200,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,338,160 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them