Title |
Rapid and sensitive detection of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus by loop mediated isothermal amplification combined with a lateral flow dipstick
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Microbiology, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2180-14-86 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Luciano A Rigano, Florencia Malamud, Ingrid G Orce, Maria P Filippone, Maria R Marano, Alexandre Morais do Amaral, Atilio P Castagnaro, Adrian A Vojnov |
Abstract |
Citrus Huanglongbing (HLB) is the most devastating bacterial citrus disease worldwide. Three Candidatus Liberibacter species are associated with different forms of the disease: Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus, Candidatus Liberibacter americanus and Candidatus Liberibacter africanus. Amongst them, Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus is the most widespread and economically important. These Gram-negative bacterial plant pathogens are phloem-limited and vectored by citrus psyllids. The current management strategy of HLB is based on early and accurate detection of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus in both citrus plants and vector insects. Nowadays, real time PCR is the method of choice for this task, mainly because of its sensitivity and reliability. However, this methodology has several drawbacks, namely high equipment costs, the need for highly trained personnel, the time required to conduct the whole process, and the difficulty in carrying out the detection reactions in field conditions. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 147 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 41 | 27% |
Student > Master | 18 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
Other | 23 | 15% |
Unknown | 36 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 74 | 49% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 13% |
Engineering | 5 | 3% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 3% |
Chemistry | 4 | 3% |
Other | 10 | 7% |
Unknown | 34 | 23% |