↓ Skip to main content

HIV serostatus and disclosure: implications for infant feeding practice in rural south Nyanza, Kenya

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
377 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
HIV serostatus and disclosure: implications for infant feeding practice in rural south Nyanza, Kenya
Published in
BMC Public Health, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-390
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maricianah A Onono, Craig R Cohen, Mable Jerop, Elizabeth A Bukusi, Janet M Turan

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that HIV-infected women practice exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) for the first 6 months postpartum to reduce HIV transmission. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of HIV/AIDS knowledge and other psychosocial factors on EBF practice among pregnant and postpartum women in rural Nyanza, Kenya, an area with a high prevalence of HIV.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 377 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 376 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 16%
Researcher 46 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 9%
Student > Bachelor 32 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 7%
Other 58 15%
Unknown 117 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 63 17%
Psychology 40 11%
Social Sciences 30 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Other 35 9%
Unknown 130 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2015.
All research outputs
#6,539,710
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,869
of 15,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,964
of 228,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#114
of 269 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 269 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.