↓ Skip to main content

Online Pestkoppenstoppen: systematic and theory-based development of a web-based tailored intervention for adolescent cyberbully victims to combat and prevent cyberbullying

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
356 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Online Pestkoppenstoppen: systematic and theory-based development of a web-based tailored intervention for adolescent cyberbully victims to combat and prevent cyberbullying
Published in
BMC Public Health, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-396
Pubmed ID
Authors

Niels CL Jacobs, Trijntje Völlink, Francine Dehue, Lilian Lechner

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to give an integrative insight into the theoretical and empirical-based development of the Online Pestkoppenstoppen (Stop Bullies Online/Stop Online Bullies). This intervention aims to reduce the number of cyberbully victims and their symptoms of depression and anxiety (program goal), by teaching cyberbully victims how to cope in an adequate and effective manner with cyberbully incidents (program's outcomes).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 356 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Unknown 345 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 17%
Student > Master 54 15%
Student > Bachelor 41 12%
Researcher 30 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 8%
Other 54 15%
Unknown 88 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 88 25%
Social Sciences 53 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 8%
Computer Science 21 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 4%
Other 42 12%
Unknown 106 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2022.
All research outputs
#4,113,911
of 23,435,471 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,545
of 15,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,044
of 228,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#64
of 269 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,435,471 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 269 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.