You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluating an audit and feedback intervention for reducing antibiotic prescribing behaviour in general dental practice (the RAPiD trial): a partial factorial cluster randomised trial protocol
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-9-50 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maria Prior, Paula Elouafkaoui, Andrew Elders, Linda Young, Eilidh M Duncan, Rumana Newlands, Jan E Clarkson, Craig R Ramsay, the Translation Research in a Dental Setting (TRiaDS) Research Methodology Group |
Abstract |
Antibiotic prescribing in dentistry accounts for 9% of total antibiotic prescriptions in Scottish primary care. The Scottish Dental Clinical Effectiveness Programme (SDCEP) published guidance in April 2008 (2nd edition, August 2011) for Drug Prescribing in Dentistry, which aims to assist dentists to make evidence-based antibiotic prescribing decisions. However, wide variation in prescribing persists and the overall use of antibiotics is increasing. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 42% |
Scientists | 5 | 42% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
United States | 2 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 139 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 21 | 15% |
Student > Master | 20 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 13% |
Other | 8 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
Other | 28 | 19% |
Unknown | 40 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 38% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 8% |
Psychology | 11 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
Other | 13 | 9% |
Unknown | 41 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2023.
All research outputs
#4,444,758
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#857
of 1,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,349
of 230,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#19
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.