↓ Skip to main content

Traditional healers and the potential for collaboration with the national tuberculosis programme in Vanuatu: results from a mixed methods study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Traditional healers and the potential for collaboration with the national tuberculosis programme in Vanuatu: results from a mixed methods study
Published in
BMC Public Health, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-393
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kerri Viney, Penelope Johnson, Markleen Tagaro, Saen Fanai, Nguyen N Linh, Paul Kelly, David Harley, Adrian Sleigh

Abstract

This study was conducted in the Pacific island nation of Vanuatu. Our objective was to assess knowledge, attitudes and practice of traditional healers who treat lung diseases and tuberculosis (TB), including their willingness to collaborate with the national TB programme.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malawi 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 111 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 17%
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Master 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 24 21%
Unknown 29 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 11%
Social Sciences 11 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 8%
Environmental Science 4 3%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 32 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2014.
All research outputs
#17,719,891
of 22,754,104 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#12,418
of 14,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,485
of 227,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#226
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,754,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.