↓ Skip to main content

Clinical and computed tomographic predictors of chronic bronchitis in COPD: a cross sectional analysis of the COPDGene study

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical and computed tomographic predictors of chronic bronchitis in COPD: a cross sectional analysis of the COPDGene study
Published in
Respiratory Research, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1465-9921-15-52
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victor Kim, Adam Davey, Alejandro P Comellas, Meilan K Han, George Washko, Carlos H Martinez, David Lynch, Jin Hwa Lee, Edwin K Silverman, James D Crapo, Barry J Make, Gerard J Criner, The COPDGene® Investigators

Abstract

Chronic bronchitis (CB) has been related to poor outcomes in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). From a clinical standpoint, we have shown that subjects with CB in a group with moderate to severe airflow obstruction were younger, more likely to be current smokers, male, Caucasian, had worse health related quality of life, more dyspnea, and increased exacerbation history compared to those without CB. We sought to further refine our clinical characterization of chronic bronchitics in a larger cohort and analyze the CT correlates of CB in COPD subjects. We hypothesized that COPD patients with CB would have thicker airways and a greater history of smoking, acute bronchitis, allergic rhinitis, and occupational exposures compared to those without CB.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 128 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Master 18 14%
Professor 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Other 30 23%
Unknown 26 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 30 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2014.
All research outputs
#15,169,543
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#1,601
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,601
of 241,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#17
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.