You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
AIB1 gene amplification and the instability of polyQ encoding sequence in breast cancer cell lines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, May 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2407-6-111 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lee-Jun C Wong, Pu Dai, Jyh-Feng Lu, Mary Ann Lou, Robert Clarke, Viktor Nazarov |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 44% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 56% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,536,586
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#2,095
of 8,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,266
of 66,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#6
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,356 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.