↓ Skip to main content

Snacking patterns, diet quality, and cardiovascular risk factors in adults

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Snacking patterns, diet quality, and cardiovascular risk factors in adults
Published in
BMC Public Health, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-388
Pubmed ID
Authors

Theresa A Nicklas, Carol E O’Neil, Victor L Fulgoni III

Abstract

The relationship of snacking patterns on nutrient intake and cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) in adults is unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the associations of snacking patterns with nutrient intake, diet quality, and a selection of CVRF in adults participating in the 2001-2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 170 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 17%
Student > Master 28 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Lecturer 9 5%
Other 33 19%
Unknown 36 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 10%
Social Sciences 14 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 48 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,471,068
of 23,509,982 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,816
of 15,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,602
of 228,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#45
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,509,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.