You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical and environmental isolates constitute a single population with high phenotypic diversity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-15-318 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
María-Victoria Grosso-Becerra, Christian Santos-Medellín, Abigail González-Valdez, José-Luis Méndez, Gabriela Delgado, Rosario Morales-Espinosa, Luis Servín-González, Luis-David Alcaraz, Gloria Soberón-Chávez |
| Abstract |
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic pathogen with a high incidence of hospital infections that represents a threat to immune compromised patients. Genomic studies have shown that, in contrast to other pathogenic bacteria, clinical and environmental isolates do not show particular genomic differences. In addition, genetic variability of all the P. aeruginosa strains whose genomes have been sequenced is extremely low. This low genomic variability might be explained if clinical strains constitute a subpopulation of this bacterial species present in environments that are close to human populations, which preferentially produce virulence associated traits. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 2 | 33% |
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| Finland | 1 | 17% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 174 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 10% |
| Researcher | 17 | 10% |
| Other | 29 | 16% |
| Unknown | 26 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 38 | 21% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 28 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Unknown | 34 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2015.
All research outputs
#12,705,236
of 22,754,104 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#4,388
of 10,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,013
of 227,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#58
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,754,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,637 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.