You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cycling performance decrement is greater in hypobaric versus normobaric hypoxia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Extreme Physiology & Medicine, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2046-7648-3-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Beth A Beidleman, Charles S Fulco, Janet E Staab, Sean P Andrew, Stephen R Muza |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to determine whether cycling time trial (TT) performance differs between hypobaric hypoxia (HH) and normobaric hypoxia (NH) at the same ambient PO2 (93 mmHg, 4,300-m altitude equivalent). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 50 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 23% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 24 | 45% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2014.
All research outputs
#6,777,832
of 22,754,104 outputs
Outputs from Extreme Physiology & Medicine
#56
of 106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,528
of 227,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Extreme Physiology & Medicine
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,754,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 106 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.2. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.