You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Lives Saved Tool (LiST) as a model for diarrhea mortality reduction
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-12-70 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Christa L Fischer Walker, Neff Walker |
Abstract |
Diarrhea is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among children under five years of age. The Lives Saved Tool (LiST) is a model used to calculate deaths averted or lives saved by past interventions and for the purposes of program planning when costly and time consuming impact studies are not possible. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 127 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 29 | 22% |
Researcher | 18 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
Lecturer | 6 | 5% |
Other | 22 | 17% |
Unknown | 25 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 26% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 16% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 3% |
Other | 23 | 18% |
Unknown | 34 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2019.
All research outputs
#14,895,165
of 24,953,268 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#3,162
of 3,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,242
of 233,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#49
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,953,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.