You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Perceptions of individuals living with spinal cord injury toward preference-based quality of life instruments: a qualitative exploration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-7525-12-50 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David GT Whitehurst, Nitya Suryaprakash, Lidia Engel, Nicole Mittmann, Vanessa K Noonan, Marcel FS Dvorak, Stirling Bryan |
| Abstract |
Generic preference-based health-related quality of life instruments are widely used to measure health benefit within economic evaluation. The availability of multiple instruments raises questions about their relative merits and recent studies have highlighted the paucity of evidence regarding measurement properties in the context of spinal cord injury (SCI). This qualitative study explores the views of individuals living with SCI towards six established instruments with the objective of identifying 'preferred' outcome measures (from the perspective of the study participants). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 10% |
| Psychology | 5 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 27 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2018.
All research outputs
#16,722,190
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,372
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,788
of 240,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#17
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.