↓ Skip to main content

Effective autodissemination of pyriproxyfen to breeding sites by the exophilic malaria vector Anopheles arabiensis in semi-field settings in Tanzania

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effective autodissemination of pyriproxyfen to breeding sites by the exophilic malaria vector Anopheles arabiensis in semi-field settings in Tanzania
Published in
Malaria Journal, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-13-161
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dickson Lwetoijera, Caroline Harris, Samson Kiware, Stefan Dongus, Gregor J Devine, Philip J McCall, Silas Majambere

Abstract

Malaria vector control strategies that target adult female mosquitoes are challenged by the emergence of insecticide resistance and behavioural resilience. Conventional larviciding is restricted by high operational costs and inadequate knowledge of mosquito-breeding habitats in rural settings that might be overcome by the juvenile hormone analogue, Pyriproxyfen (PPF). This study assessed the potential for Anopheles arabiensis to pick up and transfer lethal doses of PPF from contamination sites to their breeding habitats (i.e. autodissemination of PPF).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 116 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 25%
Student > Master 27 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Other 7 6%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 25 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 13%
Environmental Science 15 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 32 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2018.
All research outputs
#6,506,812
of 23,924,386 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,761
of 5,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,941
of 230,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#27
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,924,386 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.