↓ Skip to main content

Etiology and antibiotic resistance patterns of community-acquired urinary tract infections in J N M C Hospital Aligarh, India

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 604)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
306 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
388 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Etiology and antibiotic resistance patterns of community-acquired urinary tract infections in J N M C Hospital Aligarh, India
Published in
Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, March 2007
DOI 10.1186/1476-0711-6-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohammed Akram, Mohammed Shahid, Asad U Khan

Abstract

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) remain the common infections diagnosed in outpatients as well as hospitalized patients. Current knowledge on antimicrobial susceptibility pattern is essential for appropriate therapy. Extended-Spectrum beta-Lactamase (ESBL) producing bacteria may not be detected by routine disk diffusion susceptibility test, leading to inappropriate use of antibiotics and treatment failure. The aim of this study was to determine the distribution and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of bacterial strains isolated from patients with community acquired urinary tract infections (UTIs) at Aligarh hospital in India as well as identification of ESBL producers in the population of different uropathogens.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 388 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 380 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 16%
Student > Bachelor 57 15%
Student > Postgraduate 43 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 10%
Researcher 32 8%
Other 61 16%
Unknown 95 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 99 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 43 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 4%
Other 53 14%
Unknown 105 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,680,876
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
#44
of 604 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,127
of 76,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 604 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them