You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Rapid diagnostic tests for malaria and health workers’ adherence to test results at health facilities in Zambia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Malaria Journal, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-13-166 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Christine Manyando, Eric M Njunju, Justin Chileshe, Seter Siziya, Clive Shiff |
Abstract |
In Zambia, there has been a large scaling up of interventions to control malaria in recent years including the deployment of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) to improve malaria surveillance data as well as guide malaria treatment in health facilities. The practical challenge is the impact of RDT results on subsequent management of patients. This study explored the role of RDTs in malaria diagnosis and the health workers' adherence to test results. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nigeria | 1 | 17% |
United States | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nigeria | 2 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Burkina Faso | 1 | <1% |
Kenya | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 153 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 34 | 21% |
Researcher | 26 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 7% |
Other | 38 | 24% |
Unknown | 17 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 34% |
Social Sciences | 16 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 9% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 3% |
Other | 33 | 21% |
Unknown | 20 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2014.
All research outputs
#8,076,539
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,530
of 5,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,265
of 232,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#36
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.