↓ Skip to main content

Rapid diagnostic tests for malaria and health workers’ adherence to test results at health facilities in Zambia

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rapid diagnostic tests for malaria and health workers’ adherence to test results at health facilities in Zambia
Published in
Malaria Journal, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-13-166
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine Manyando, Eric M Njunju, Justin Chileshe, Seter Siziya, Clive Shiff

Abstract

In Zambia, there has been a large scaling up of interventions to control malaria in recent years including the deployment of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) to improve malaria surveillance data as well as guide malaria treatment in health facilities. The practical challenge is the impact of RDT results on subsequent management of patients. This study explored the role of RDTs in malaria diagnosis and the health workers' adherence to test results.

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nigeria 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Burkina Faso 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Unknown 153 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 21%
Researcher 26 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 13%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Other 11 7%
Other 38 24%
Unknown 17 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 34%
Social Sciences 16 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 3%
Other 33 21%
Unknown 20 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2014.
All research outputs
#8,076,539
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,530
of 5,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,265
of 232,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#36
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.