↓ Skip to main content

The SystHERs registry: an observational cohort study of treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive metastatic breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The SystHERs registry: an observational cohort study of treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive metastatic breast cancer
Published in
BMC Cancer, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-14-307
Pubmed ID
Authors

Debu Tripathy, Hope S Rugo, Peter A Kaufman, Sandra Swain, Joyce O’Shaughnessy, Mohammad Jahanzeb, Ginny Mason, Mary Beattie, Bongin Yoo, Catherine Lai, Anthony Masaquel, Sara Hurvitz

Abstract

Amplification of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene occurs in approximately 20% of invasive breast cancer cases and is associated with a more aggressive disease course than HER2-negative breast cancer. HER2-targeted therapies have altered the natural history of HER2-positive breast cancer, a trend that will likely further improve with the recent approval of new agents. A prospective, observational cohort study was designed and initiated to provide real-world insights into current treatment patterns, long-term survival, and patients' experiences with initial and subsequent treatments for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 85 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 17%
Student > Master 12 14%
Other 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 19 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 5%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 27 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2014.
All research outputs
#15,299,919
of 22,754,104 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#4,106
of 8,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,204
of 227,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#69
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,754,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,275 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.