↓ Skip to main content

Exhaled breath profiling for diagnosing acute respiratory distress syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exhaled breath profiling for diagnosing acute respiratory distress syndrome
Published in
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2466-14-72
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lieuwe DJ Bos, Marcus J Schultz, Peter J Sterk

Abstract

The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common, devastating complication of critical illness that is characterized by pulmonary injury and inflammation. The clinical diagnosis may be improved by means of objective biological markers. Electronic nose (eNose) technology can rapidly and non-invasively provide breath prints, which are profiles of volatile metabolites in the exhaled breath. We hypothesized that breath prints could facilitate accurate diagnosis of ARDS in intubated and ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 17%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Engineering 4 5%
Physics and Astronomy 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 24 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2022.
All research outputs
#3,852,603
of 21,392,919 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#263
of 1,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,986
of 204,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,392,919 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them