↓ Skip to main content

Emergence and evolution of social self-management of Parkinson’s disease: study protocol for a 3-year prospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neurology, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Emergence and evolution of social self-management of Parkinson’s disease: study protocol for a 3-year prospective cohort study
Published in
BMC Neurology, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2377-14-95
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linda Tickle-Degnen, Marie Saint-Hilaire, Cathi A Thomas, Barbara Habermann, Linda S Sprague Martinez, Norma Terrin, Farzad Noubary, Elena N Naumova

Abstract

Parkinson's disease affects facial, vocal and trunk muscles. As symptoms progress, facial expression becomes masked, limiting the person's ability to communicate emotions and intentions to others. As people with the disease live and reside in their homes longer, the burden of caregiving is unmitigated by social and emotional rewards provided by an expressive individual. Little is known about how adults living with Parkinson's disease manage their social lives and how an inability to be emotionally expressive can affect social connections and health. Because social networks have been shown to be crucial to the overall well-being of people living with chronic diseases, research is needed on how expressive capacity affects life trajectories and health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Chile 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 116 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 16%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 26 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 14%
Psychology 17 14%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Neuroscience 6 5%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 28 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2015.
All research outputs
#12,898,658
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#975
of 2,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,746
of 227,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#21
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.