↓ Skip to main content

"Did the trial kill the intervention?" experiences from the development, implementation and evaluation of a complex intervention

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
"Did the trial kill the intervention?" experiences from the development, implementation and evaluation of a complex intervention
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-11-24
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lydia Bird, Antony Arthur, Karen Cox

Abstract

The development, implementation and evaluation of any new health intervention is complex. This paper uses experiences from the design, implementation and evaluation of a rehabilitation programme to shed light on, and prompt discussion around, some of the complexities involved in such an undertaking.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 5%
United States 2 3%
Spain 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 69 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Professor 3 4%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 35%
Social Sciences 10 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Psychology 3 4%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 18 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2014.
All research outputs
#3,196,917
of 24,615,420 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#495
of 2,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,948
of 113,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,615,420 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.