↓ Skip to main content

"Did the trial kill the intervention?" experiences from the development, implementation and evaluation of a complex intervention

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
"Did the trial kill the intervention?" experiences from the development, implementation and evaluation of a complex intervention
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-11-24
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lydia Bird, Antony Arthur, Karen Cox

Abstract

The development, implementation and evaluation of any new health intervention is complex. This paper uses experiences from the design, implementation and evaluation of a rehabilitation programme to shed light on, and prompt discussion around, some of the complexities involved in such an undertaking.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 6%
United States 2 3%
Spain 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 63 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 11%
Other 3 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 35%
Social Sciences 10 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Psychology 3 4%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 16 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2014.
All research outputs
#2,633,539
of 20,881,490 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#441
of 1,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,029
of 204,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,881,490 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,862 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them