↓ Skip to main content

Evidence of altered haemostasis in an ovine model of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence of altered haemostasis in an ovine model of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support
Published in
Critical Care, July 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13054-017-1788-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Margaret R. Passmore, Yoke L. Fung, Gabriela Simonova, Samuel R. Foley, Sara D. Diab, Kimble R. Dunster, Michelle M. Spanevello, Charles I. McDonald, John-Paul Tung, Natalie M. Pecheniuk, Karen Hay, Kiran Shekar, John F. Fraser

Abstract

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a life-saving modality used in the management of cardiopulmonary failure that is refractory to conventional medical and surgical therapies. The major problems clinicians face are bleeding and clotting, which can occur simultaneously. To discern the impact of pulmonary injury and ECMO on the host's haemostatic response, we developed an ovine model of smoke-induced acute lung injury (S-ALI) and ECMO. The aims of this study were to determine if the ECMO circuit itself altered haemostasis and if this was augmented in a host with pulmonary injury. Twenty-seven South African meat merino/Border Leicester Cross ewes underwent instrumentation. Animals received either sham injury (n = 12) or S-ALI (n = 15). Control animal groups consisted of healthy controls (ventilation only for 24 h) (n = 4), ECMO controls (ECMO only for 24 h) (n = 8) and S-ALI controls (S-ALI but no ECMO for 24 h) (n = 7). The test group comprised S-ALI sheep placed on ECMO (S-ALI + ECMO for 24 h) (n = 8). Serial blood samples were taken for rotational thromboelastometry, platelet aggregometry and routine coagulation laboratory tests. Animals were continuously monitored for haemodynamic, fluid and electrolyte balances and temperature. Pressure-controlled intermittent mandatory ventilation was used, and mean arterial pressure was augmented by protocolised use of pressors, inotropes and balanced fluid resuscitation to maintain mean arterial pressure >65 mmHg. Rotational thromboelastometry, platelet aggregometry and routine coagulation laboratory tests demonstrated that S-ALI and ECMO independently induced changes to platelet function, delayed clot formation and reduced clot firmness. This effect was augmented with the combination of S-ALI and ECMO, with evidence of increased collagen-induced platelet aggregation as well as changes in factor VIII (FVIII), factor XII and fibrinogen levels. The introduction of an ECMO circuit itself increases collagen-induced platelet aggregation, decreases FVIII and von Willebrand factor, and induces a transient decrease in fibrinogen levels and function in the first 24 h. These changes to haemostasis are amplified when a host with a pre-existing pulmonary injury is placed on ECMO. Because patients are often on ECMO for extended periods, longer-duration studies are required to characterise ECMO-induced haemostatic changes over the long term. The utility of point-of-care tests for guiding haemostatic management during ECMO also warrants further exploration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 19%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 14 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 15 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,614,470
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,279
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,646
of 326,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#50
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.