You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Discovery and replication of SNP-SNP interactions for quantitative lipid traits in over 60,000 individuals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioData Mining, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13040-017-0145-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emily R. Holzinger, Shefali S. Verma, Carrie B. Moore, Molly Hall, Rishika De, Diane Gilbert-Diamond, Matthew B. Lanktree, Nathan Pankratz, Antoinette Amuzu, Amber Burt, Caroline Dale, Scott Dudek, Clement E. Furlong, Tom R. Gaunt, Daniel Seung Kim, Helene Riess, Suthesh Sivapalaratnam, Vinicius Tragante, Erik P.A. van Iperen, Ariel Brautbar, David S. Carrell, David R. Crosslin, Gail P. Jarvik, Helena Kuivaniemi, Iftikhar J. Kullo, Eric B. Larson, Laura J. Rasmussen-Torvik, Gerard Tromp, Jens Baumert, Karen J. Cruickshanks, Martin Farrall, Aroon D. Hingorani, G. K. Hovingh, Marcus E. Kleber, Barbara E. Klein, Ronald Klein, Wolfgang Koenig, Leslie A. Lange, Winfried Mӓrz, Kari E. North, N. Charlotte Onland-Moret, Alex P. Reiner, Philippa J. Talmud, Yvonne T. van der Schouw, James G. Wilson, Mika Kivimaki, Meena Kumari, Jason H. Moore, Fotios Drenos, Folkert W. Asselbergs, Brendan J. Keating, Marylyn D. Ritchie |
| Abstract |
The genetic etiology of human lipid quantitative traits is not fully elucidated, and interactions between variants may play a role. We performed a gene-centric interaction study for four different lipid traits: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), and triglycerides (TG). Our analysis consisted of a discovery phase using a merged dataset of five different cohorts (n = 12,853 to n = 16,849 depending on lipid phenotype) and a replication phase with ten independent cohorts totaling up to 36,938 additional samples. Filters are often applied before interaction testing to correct for the burden of testing all pairwise interactions. We used two different filters: 1. A filter that tested only single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with a main effect of p < 0.001 in a previous association study. 2. A filter that only tested interactions identified by Biofilter 2.0. Pairwise models that reached an interaction significance level of p < 0.001 in the discovery dataset were tested for replication. We identified thirteen SNP-SNP models that were significant in more than one replication cohort after accounting for multiple testing. These results may reveal novel insights into the genetic etiology of lipid levels. Furthermore, we developed a pipeline to perform a computationally efficient interaction analysis with multi-cohort replication. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 38% |
| Finland | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
| Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 18 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2017.
All research outputs
#6,965,863
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from BioData Mining
#146
of 309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,433
of 316,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioData Mining
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.