You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The endogenous and reactive depression subtypes revisited: integrative animal and human studies implicate multiple distinct molecular mechanisms underlying major depressive disorder
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-12-73 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karim Malki, Robert Keers, Maria Grazia Tosto, Anbarasu Lourdusamy, Lucia Carboni, Enrico Domenici, Rudolf Uher, Peter McGuffin, Leonard C Schalkwyk |
| Abstract |
Traditional diagnoses of major depressive disorder (MDD) suggested that the presence or absence of stress prior to onset results in either 'reactive' or 'endogenous' subtypes of the disorder, respectively. Several lines of research suggest that the biological underpinnings of 'reactive' or 'endogenous' subtypes may also differ, resulting in differential response to treatment. We investigated this hypothesis by comparing the gene-expression profiles of three animal models of 'reactive' and 'endogenous' depression. We then translated these findings to clinical samples using a human post-mortem mRNA study. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 18% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Belarus | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Portugal | 1 | 6% |
| Turkey | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 12% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 147 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 15% |
| Researcher | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 36 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 27 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 14% |
| Psychology | 12 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 39 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,964,132
of 24,823,556 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,350
of 3,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,378
of 232,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#25
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,823,556 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,855 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.