↓ Skip to main content

Failure of a dietary model to affect markers of inflammation in domestic cats

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Veterinary Research, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Failure of a dietary model to affect markers of inflammation in domestic cats
Published in
BMC Veterinary Research, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1746-6148-10-104
Pubmed ID
Authors

Verbrugghe A, Janssens GP, Van de Velde H, Cox E, De Smet S, Vlaeminck B, Hesta M, Adronie Verbrugghe, Geert PJ Janssens, Hannelore Van de Velde, Eric Cox, Stefaan De Smet, Bruno Vlaeminck, Myriam Hesta

Abstract

Oxidative stress and inflammation can be altered by dietary factors in various species. However, little data are available in true carnivorous species such as domestic cats. As numerous anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative additives become available and might be of use in cats with chronic low-grade inflammatory diseases, the current study aimed to develop a model of diet-induced inflammation by use of two opposite diets. It was hypothesized that a high fat diet enhanced in n-6 PUFA and with lower concentrations of antioxidants would evoke inflammation and oxidative stress in domestic cats.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 44 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 26%
Other 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 23%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 8 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2014.
All research outputs
#3,041,178
of 4,507,778 outputs
Outputs from BMC Veterinary Research
#501
of 795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,467
of 107,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Veterinary Research
#23
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,507,778 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 795 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.