↓ Skip to main content

Magnitude and associated factors of anemia among pregnant women in Dera District: a cross-sectional study in northwest Ethiopia

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
322 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Magnitude and associated factors of anemia among pregnant women in Dera District: a cross-sectional study in northwest Ethiopia
Published in
BMC Research Notes, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13104-017-2690-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Terefe Derso, Zelalem Abera, Amare Tariku

Abstract

Anemia is associated with adverse health and socio-economic consequences among pregnant women. Particularly, severe anemia increases the risk of maternal mortality by 20%. However, literatures are scarce in the northwest Ethiopia. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the magnitude and associated factors of anemia among pregnant women attending antenatal care in Dera District, South Gondar Zone, northwest Ethiopia. A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Dera District health centers from June 27 to September 2, 2015. Capillary blood samples were taken from 348 pregnant women. The raw measured values of hemoglobin were obtained using the portable Hb301 instrument and adjusted for altitude. Besides, nutritional status of the women was assessed by the mid upper arm circumference (MUAC) taken on non-dominant upper limb, mostly of the left hand. Socio-demographic factors, obstetric history, environmental related factors and dietary intake were collected by interviewing the pregnant women. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to identify factors associated with anemia. Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was computed to show the strength of association. In multivariable analysis, a P value of <0.05 was used to declare statistical significance. The overall prevalence of anemia among pregnant women was 30.5% [95% CI 21.0, 40.0]. The result of multivariable analysis revealed that the likelihood of anemia was higher among pregnant women living in rural areas [AOR = 3.03, 95% CI 1.17, 7.82], had no latrine [AOR = 4.75, 95% CI 1.15, 16.60], low monthly income: <Eth. Birr 1200 (US dollar 52.22) [AOR = 2.56, 95% CI 1.17, 5.60], five or above parity [AOR = 4.17; 95% CI 1.62, 10.69], MUAC < 23 cm [AOR = 4.97; 95% CI 2.61, 9.43] and did not prenatal take iron supplementation [AOR = 5.63; 95% 2.21, 14.32]. So far in the district, the magnitude of anemia existed as a moderate public health concern. Thus, improved socio-economic status, latrine and maternal iron supplementation coverage are essential to mitigate the high burden of anemia. In addition, nutritional counseling and education on the consumption of extra meals and iron-rich foods should be intensified.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 322 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 16%
Student > Bachelor 43 13%
Lecturer 19 6%
Student > Postgraduate 15 5%
Researcher 14 4%
Other 23 7%
Unknown 155 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 69 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 49 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Social Sciences 7 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 <1%
Other 22 7%
Unknown 162 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2017.
All research outputs
#20,441,465
of 22,996,001 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#3,580
of 4,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#276,934
of 317,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#126
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,996,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.